Evidence
The evidence for the evidence checker.
We hold our own claims to the standard we ask of others: findings are separated into candidate, human-verified, and author-confirmed, and headline rates are withheld until a corpus is fully adjudicated.
Stress-tested on influential clinical-trial evidence.
We evaluated Adcurare across 50 influential recent clinical-trial reports. The system surfaced candidate numerical inconsistencies, reporting omissions, and cross-document discrepancies that warranted further examination.
UnpublishedResults are being independently adjudicated. Numbers publish only after all 50 trials are reviewed.
- No error rate is published until all 50 trials are systematically adjudicated.
- Candidate, human-verified, author-confirmed, and corrected findings are reported separately.
- Trials with unresolved findings are not named.
- Sampling methodology and limitations are disclosed.
Three ways to check our work.
A full sample Rigor Record
See the complete anatomy: claims, sources, findings by materiality, calculations, confidence, and follow-up.
The Rigor Showcase
Real Rigor Reviews of high-impact clinical evidence: the inconsistencies, gaps, and unsupported claims a rigorous read surfaces.
How we evaluate
The full methodology: sources, calculation and consistency checks, and the confidence vs. materiality distinction.